I'm a kind-hearted racist, I love my own people and want to preserve and promote them. I wish the best for other groups but will oppose them if they threaten my own. Moral racism and immoral racism must be distinguished, as wicked people have blended the two into one where decent people are afraid of social shame to protect themselves against invasion and ethnic cleansing.
What the Ashkenazi's have done to destroy my people is an act of war and by the grace of God, they will be destroyed for what they have done.
And even all that being said, I pray for their repentance and conversion to Christ, it never was about hatred, but attempts to exterminate Europeans globally is so wicked, it's hard to imagine there isn't some kind of demonic influence going on.
I praise God for ones like Brother Augustine, who show what true repentance is, exposing the evils of his former tribe: https://files.catbox.moe/48x2w8.jpg
It's to the point everyone has to start openly warning what's happening, we are at war with the jews, and it becomes quite clear why "200 Years Together" is still banned from publication 20 years later:
Then all those who fled Germany (as even boomer Chuck Woolery notes, https://files.catbox.moe/ho739g.png), started the Frankfurt school "denazification" program that Academic Agent gets into here, brainwashing boomers from a young age into egalitarian thinking, with heavy White guilt:
Academic Agent: Deconstruction the Boomer Truth Regime
James B Jordan was trying to warn, Romans 11 already happened prior to 70AD, the tribe of Judah was jealous of the explosion in gentile conversions and many did convert.
He also warns, this modern notion of putting Ashkenazi's, who are racially mixed with various other groups, much like the Samaritans, have no promises connected to the Old Testament, and this modern notion that they are somehow the center of Christianity, seems to be a kind of Satanic delusion:
When one looks at all of that, all other questions of racism and kinism fall away and the situation becomes clear. The heart of the matter is the JQ.
When that's dealt with, people can be free to marry and live with who they want, freedom of association, then the general notion that race mixing isn't ideal, but no one will care if it happens on occasion, as long as it's not with blacks as that brings visceral disgust in a way that doesn't happen when white mixes with hispanic or asian, nature is its own testimony.
I was almost a missionary to Haiti, and I still feel this disgust sensation towards black people I never knew why it was there, and I used to feel guilt, but now I realize it's a protection mechanism and not borne out of blind hatred towards anyone, God designed it this way to separate us.
This article doesn't really say much except, "I'm not technically a kinist, but...". There is a statement that seems to indicate that the mixing of ethnicities/races/cultures is causing damage, but not much more. What do you see as a solution to some of these issues? What are some things that you would suggest?
This would probably be a topic for another post. The goal of this post was to properly distinguish between a Christian racial consciousness itself and kinism. People are itching for a fight over this, and being able to distinguish between these views can lower the temperature.
Like all questions of wisdom, it involves dealing with particulars on a case by case basis and applying sound reason and logic regarding truths.
Your idea that the New Testament abrogates racial differences is misguided.
Acts 17:26 rephrases Deuteronomy 32:8 and states that God determined the *boundaries* of the nations.
And Paul, for all of his outreach efforts to the Gentiles (for which we must be grateful) was a Jewish kinist. Not only does he puts the Jews, his people, in a primus inter pares place of honor in Romans 1:16 and 2:10, in Romans 4:24 he states that he would wish to get cursed for the sake of his kinsmen *according to the flesh* and then states that to them belongs glory for the Covenants and for the giving of the Law and for Jesus being of their *flesh* (which does not mean we should worship them, Paul makes it very clear also. Understood, Christian Zionists?)
The point of this comment is: kinism is natural and good and godly, and the fact that the enemies of God are embarking on a neo-Babel global project should make it doubly clear.
Also, how come barely any discussion about race-mixing mentions that the sex of the race-mixer matters?
Looks like you misread me. See the paragraph that begins, "Still, membership in the one holy nation of God does not abolish one’s race or ethnicity. This is obvious from basic personal observation, but it is affirmed in the Bible."
I was careful to define kinism because what you are describing does not meet my definition. I share your concern about a neo-babel, and about the way that Western Christians have uniquely been trained to loose their natural affections for kinsmen according to the flesh, it just wasn't the topic of this post.
First of all, apologies for the sexual references, I removed them.
Onto your point: If I read correctly, your definition of (strong) kinism can be shortened as "race-mixing is inherently sinful".
This seems to be a strawman of the kinist position, which Wikipedia correctly resumes as "the divinely ordained social order is tribal instead of propositional" which does not necessarily imply the Christian Identity position of "only Whites are capable of receiving salvation", and is the position my comment was defending.
Does the Bible contain cases of interracial unions? Yes, but the parameters are more restrictive than the "weak kinist" position of "be careful, it's usually not worth it": it's either "a man of our tribe taking a woman from another tribe" (Moses) or "a woman of our tribe marrying the most powerful man on Earth" (Esther) in both cases, the Israelite tribes benefitted from such unions, but in most other cases it wouldn't.
Natural law seems to be in favor of interracial marriage. Children of mixed-race couples often have exceptionally beautiful features, and the genetic diversity can be beneficial for health.
I'm a kind-hearted racist, I love my own people and want to preserve and promote them. I wish the best for other groups but will oppose them if they threaten my own. Moral racism and immoral racism must be distinguished, as wicked people have blended the two into one where decent people are afraid of social shame to protect themselves against invasion and ethnic cleansing.
What the Ashkenazi's have done to destroy my people is an act of war and by the grace of God, they will be destroyed for what they have done.
And even all that being said, I pray for their repentance and conversion to Christ, it never was about hatred, but attempts to exterminate Europeans globally is so wicked, it's hard to imagine there isn't some kind of demonic influence going on.
I praise God for ones like Brother Augustine, who show what true repentance is, exposing the evils of his former tribe: https://files.catbox.moe/48x2w8.jpg
It's to the point everyone has to start openly warning what's happening, we are at war with the jews, and it becomes quite clear why "200 Years Together" is still banned from publication 20 years later:
https://files.catbox.moe/pti3tl.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/khk98o.jpg
Then all those who fled Germany (as even boomer Chuck Woolery notes, https://files.catbox.moe/ho739g.png), started the Frankfurt school "denazification" program that Academic Agent gets into here, brainwashing boomers from a young age into egalitarian thinking, with heavy White guilt:
Academic Agent: Deconstruction the Boomer Truth Regime
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO0MloTwGgjj3Z84ZVNeLhBiUpCG0m1CM
Demoralization: What Yuri Bezmenov didn't tell you (Frankfurt school denazification program that's still ongoing in the US/Europe by Ashkenazi's)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niiF8hCSrYQ
James B Jordan was trying to warn, Romans 11 already happened prior to 70AD, the tribe of Judah was jealous of the explosion in gentile conversions and many did convert.
https://lastdayspast.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/The-Future-of-Israel-Re-examined-James-B.-Jordan.pdf
He also warns, this modern notion of putting Ashkenazi's, who are racially mixed with various other groups, much like the Samaritans, have no promises connected to the Old Testament, and this modern notion that they are somehow the center of Christianity, seems to be a kind of Satanic delusion:
https://files.catbox.moe/heswyj.mp4
When one looks at all of that, all other questions of racism and kinism fall away and the situation becomes clear. The heart of the matter is the JQ.
When that's dealt with, people can be free to marry and live with who they want, freedom of association, then the general notion that race mixing isn't ideal, but no one will care if it happens on occasion, as long as it's not with blacks as that brings visceral disgust in a way that doesn't happen when white mixes with hispanic or asian, nature is its own testimony.
I was almost a missionary to Haiti, and I still feel this disgust sensation towards black people I never knew why it was there, and I used to feel guilt, but now I realize it's a protection mechanism and not borne out of blind hatred towards anyone, God designed it this way to separate us.
This article doesn't really say much except, "I'm not technically a kinist, but...". There is a statement that seems to indicate that the mixing of ethnicities/races/cultures is causing damage, but not much more. What do you see as a solution to some of these issues? What are some things that you would suggest?
This would probably be a topic for another post. The goal of this post was to properly distinguish between a Christian racial consciousness itself and kinism. People are itching for a fight over this, and being able to distinguish between these views can lower the temperature.
Like all questions of wisdom, it involves dealing with particulars on a case by case basis and applying sound reason and logic regarding truths.
Your idea that the New Testament abrogates racial differences is misguided.
Acts 17:26 rephrases Deuteronomy 32:8 and states that God determined the *boundaries* of the nations.
And Paul, for all of his outreach efforts to the Gentiles (for which we must be grateful) was a Jewish kinist. Not only does he puts the Jews, his people, in a primus inter pares place of honor in Romans 1:16 and 2:10, in Romans 4:24 he states that he would wish to get cursed for the sake of his kinsmen *according to the flesh* and then states that to them belongs glory for the Covenants and for the giving of the Law and for Jesus being of their *flesh* (which does not mean we should worship them, Paul makes it very clear also. Understood, Christian Zionists?)
The point of this comment is: kinism is natural and good and godly, and the fact that the enemies of God are embarking on a neo-Babel global project should make it doubly clear.
Also, how come barely any discussion about race-mixing mentions that the sex of the race-mixer matters?
Looks like you misread me. See the paragraph that begins, "Still, membership in the one holy nation of God does not abolish one’s race or ethnicity. This is obvious from basic personal observation, but it is affirmed in the Bible."
I was careful to define kinism because what you are describing does not meet my definition. I share your concern about a neo-babel, and about the way that Western Christians have uniquely been trained to loose their natural affections for kinsmen according to the flesh, it just wasn't the topic of this post.
Finally, please avoid using such sexual language.
First of all, apologies for the sexual references, I removed them.
Onto your point: If I read correctly, your definition of (strong) kinism can be shortened as "race-mixing is inherently sinful".
This seems to be a strawman of the kinist position, which Wikipedia correctly resumes as "the divinely ordained social order is tribal instead of propositional" which does not necessarily imply the Christian Identity position of "only Whites are capable of receiving salvation", and is the position my comment was defending.
Does the Bible contain cases of interracial unions? Yes, but the parameters are more restrictive than the "weak kinist" position of "be careful, it's usually not worth it": it's either "a man of our tribe taking a woman from another tribe" (Moses) or "a woman of our tribe marrying the most powerful man on Earth" (Esther) in both cases, the Israelite tribes benefitted from such unions, but in most other cases it wouldn't.
Natural law seems to be in favor of interracial marriage. Children of mixed-race couples often have exceptionally beautiful features, and the genetic diversity can be beneficial for health.